‘’ The world suffers a lot. Not because the violence of bad people.
But because the silence of good people ‘’
Military
trial is the distinct legal system in contrast of criminal justice system. It
applicable on both military officers and in particular circumstances on civilian.
the practice to run military court simultaneously to general justice system is
exist in many countries including Pakistan but the procedure which is adopted
in military trial of Pakistan is completely opposite the procedure which is
practice in our criminal courts so, that brutal trial just not affront the fair
trial process but also raise question on the independence of judiciary of Pakistan.
Historically,
the establishment of military court in Pakistan is based on these three piece
of legislation include Pakistan Army Act 1952, Pakistan air force act 1953 and
Pakistan Navy ordinance 1961. Generally the purpose to establish military court
to maintence discipline among military offices
and make them accountable for their guilty actions so its jurisdiction is just
limited to military officers not applicable on civilian but its jurisdiction
extend to civilian in 1967 by defense
service law amendment ordinance 1967 ( Aye khan Region ) and in 1975 ( Z.A
Bhutto region ) so , after that military court have jurisdiction to trial of
civilian for offences which are covered under Pakistan army act 1952 and
official secret act 1923 .
Moreover,
the jurisdiction of military court more extends after the brutal incident of
army public school, 16 Dec 2014. that was the shocking incident for whole
country and to avoid such type of terrorist attack a tremendous step need to
take so on account of state security and necessity the jurisdiction of military
court extend to terrorism cases by 21st amendment in constitution of
Pakistan but that power just for 2 years but further extend to 2 years in 2017
by 23rd amendment in constitution of Pakistan due to its speedy
trial system but that power end in 2019 by sunset clause.
Practically
, its seems that civilian can be trial in military court in Pakistan for those
offences covered under Pakistan army act 1952 and official secret act 1923 and
not others but that’s possibility is not the guarantee that the trial conduct
here is fair .
Basically, the procedure practice in military trial in Pakistan is completely opposite to the procedure practice in criminal trial in Pakistan like in military court
Trial conducted by military officers.
Trial conducted in military installments.
Proceedings are conduct under secrecy, no camera, and no media
Detention for indefinite time
Accused after confession again send back to the custody of military officers
Obstruction in consultancy with own council
Judgment without reason and finding
No copy of judgment is provided
No right of appeal available against judgment of military officers
Conviction granted on confession
So, these all facts demonstrate that the trial conduct in military court is not fair because for fair trial that is necessary that
Presiding officers must be competent , independent and impartial
Confession must be voluntary without coercion
Every person must have right to consult his counsel
Due process must be followed
1. Accused send in judicial custody
after confession
2. Judgment must be reason base
3. Copy of judgment provided for appeal
4. Have right of appeal
So, the military trial of civilian is just not affront the fair trial but also violate of Art 14 of
ICCPR which is ratified by Pakistan. Moreover its existence simultaneously with general
judicial system also raise question on independence of our judiciary.
So, in current scenario on the ground of state necessity as
the Guardian of constitution that is the responsibility of law makers to
empower the current criminal justice system.

0 Comments